Error messageDeprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in _menu_load_objects() (line 579 of /home/aim401k/public_html/includes/menu.inc).
Fiduciary Responsibility: Diligence Is Keye
Diligent and ongoing adherence to a multifaceted risk-management strategy can help sponsors accomplish two important priorities simultaneously: improving participants’ ability to pursue their financial goals for retirement and reducing sponsors’ potential exposure to claims of fiduciary malfeasance.
To ensure success, however, sponsors must first understand their broad range of fiduciary responsibilities as defined by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), and then systematically review their tactics for achieving compliance.
ERISA: The Letters of the Law
ERISA mandates that a plan fiduciary must fulfill four primary responsibilities:
- To act solely in the interests of plan participants and beneficiaries
- To do so with the care, skill, and diligence characteristic of a “prudent” person familiar with such matters
- To diversify plan investments, with exceptions for investments in company stock
- To comply with the written plan document
Implicit in the ERISA guidelines is the need for sponsors to monitor all investment options, not just company stock. While ERISA does not specifically define what type of monitoring practices should be employed, many experts recommend that plan fiduciaries should review each investment option at least once per quarter to make sure that it remains a potentially appropriate option for participant contributions. Details of such monitoring procedures should be spelled out in the plan’s investment policy documents, but such a review should typically resemble the process employed for investment selection and take into account the following considerations:
- A comparison of recent and rolling performance data, relative to an appropriate peer group and industry index
- An assessment of risk-adjusted performance relative to a relevant peer group
- The significance of changes to a portfolio management team
- The significance of changes to investment strategy (e.g., has style drift occurred?)
- Whether investment options offered by the plan complement the plan’s stated investment strategy
- Whether there has been a significant increase or decrease in the plan’s fees and/or assets under management
Of course, these initiatives may prove relatively useless in court if they remain undocumented. For that reason, the individuals or committees responsible for such tasks should make every effort to keep detailed minutes of their discussions and decisions.
Getting the Word Out
In addition to "back office" oversight, plan sponsors are also advised to communicate clearly, honestly, and frequently with plan participants. Under normal circumstances, those communications might address a wide array of topics -- such as how the plan works, how to calculate a savings goal, and how to arrive at realistic investment expectations -- as well as basic educational themes, such as the importance of asset allocation, diversification, and investment risk.
But when volatility negatively influences the value of specific investment options -- particularly employer stock -- it may be appropriate to issue a message from company management explaining the current situation and reinforcing the need to maintain a long-term, diversified investment strategy.
Keep in mind that a company cannot give participants more information about a specific security than they would be allowed to give to other shareholders. Also, make sure that participant communications do not contain any information that could be perceived as erroneous, inconsistent, or promissory in nature. If a plan restricts participants’ ability to sell company stock, then eliminating or easing such restrictions may be an effective way of encouraging participants to reduce their overall risk profile.
© 2010 McGraw-Hill Financial Communications. All rights reserved.